4.3 Article

Impact of Short-Term Exposure to Extreme Temperatures on Mortality: A Multi-City Study in Belgium

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073763

关键词

climate change; temperature; cause-specific mortality; case-crossover; DLNM; vulnerability; Belgium

资金

  1. Sciensano

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Temperature has a significant impact on health, with both low and high temperatures associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. The sensitivity to temperature varies among different age groups and genders, and individuals living in developed areas are more vulnerable to high temperatures. There is no confounding effect of air pollutants on the results.
In light of climate change, health risks are expected to be exacerbated by more frequent high temperatures and reduced by less frequent cold extremes. To assess the impact of different climate change scenarios, it is necessary to describe the current effects of temperature on health. A time-stratified case-crossover design fitted with conditional quasi-Poisson regressions and distributed lag non-linear models was applied to estimate specific temperature-mortality associations in nine urban agglomerations in Belgium, and a random-effect meta-analysis was conducted to pool the estimates. Based on 307,859 all-cause natural deaths, the mortality risk associated to low temperature was 1.32 (95% CI: 1.21-1.44) and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08-1.36) for high temperature relative to the minimum mortality temperature (23.1 degrees C). Both cold and heat were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and respiratory mortality. We observed differences in risk by age category, and women were more vulnerable to heat than men. People living in the most built-up municipalities were at higher risk for heat. Air pollutants did not have a confounding effect. Evidence from this study helps to identify specific populations at risk and is important for current and future public health interventions and prevention strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据