4.3 Article

Changes in Accommodative and Binocular Function following Phakic Intraocular Lens for High and Low-to-Moderate Myopia

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116716

关键词

refractive surgery; phakic intraocular lens; implantable collamer lens (ICL); accommodation; binocular vision; high-myopia and low-to-moderate myopia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the accommodative and binocular function of phakic intraocular lens ICL in high and low-to-moderate myopia. The results showed improvement in residual refractive error at 1 month after surgery in both groups. However, there was a significant decrease in the push-up amplitude of accommodation after 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, and no significant changes were found in other binocular measurements.
The aim was to evaluate accommodative and binocular function of phakic intraocular lens implantable collamer lens (ICL) in high and low-to-moderate myopia. Prospective comparative cohort study with 38 myopic patients who underwent ICL implantation were divided into two groups of 19 patients, each one based on the spherical equivalent (SE): high-power (SE <= -6 D) and low-to-moderate (SE > -6 D). The push-up amplitude of accommodation (AA), monocular accommodative facility (MAF), distance and near ocular deviation, near convergence amplitude, near point convergence (NPC), stereopsis, and accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio were assessed before surgery and 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. The mean residual refractive error at 1 month after surgery improved in both groups, 0.18 +/- 0.34 D and 0.09 +/- 0.26 D, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a significant decrease in AA in both groups between preoperatively and at 1-week (p = 0.001; p = 0.008, respectively) and 1-month follow-up (p = 0.001; p = 0.008). For the rest of the binocular measurements, no statistically significant postoperative changes were found in any group. This finding suggests follow-up studies on amplitude of accommodation in phakic intraocular lens ICL implantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据