4.3 Review

Effect of Physical Activity on Depression in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116849

关键词

Parkinson's disease; physical activity; depression; meta-analysis

资金

  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Teaching Development Fund Project [CTLD21J0009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review of 14 RCT studies and found that physical activity can moderately improve depression symptoms in PD patients, especially in those with a disease duration of more than 5 years. However, larger sample sizes and high-quality studies are needed in the future to validate these effects.
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease worldwide, and approximately 50% of PD patients suffer from depression. We aim to determine the effects of physical activity on depression in PD patients and to provide scientific evidence-based exercise prescriptions for PD patients. A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo until February 2022 for randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies published in English. The primary outcome was a score on a depression scale. A total of 14 RCTs involving 516 patients with PD were included in this study. The results of the meta-analysis showed that physical activity had a moderate and significant improvement in depression in PD patients (SMD = -0.60; 95% CI = -0.79 to -0.41; p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis indicated that resistance exercise for 60-90 min more than 4 times per week for up to 12 weeks had a significant effect on PD patients who have had the disease for more than 5 years. Meta-regression showed that intervention type, intervention time, intervention frequency, intervention period, age, and disease duration were not sources of heterogeneity. Physical activity may reduce depression in PD patients. However, other larger sample sizes and high-quality studies are needed to validate these effects in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据