4.4 Review

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 327-680

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alr.22929

关键词

anosmia; evidence-based medicine; hyposmia; loss of smell; olfaction; olfactory dysfunction; olfactory loss; parosmia; phantosmia; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the literature on clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction over the past two decades and introduces the International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O). Nearly 100 topics were thoroughly reviewed, providing important insights and clear guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of patients, while also highlighting gaps in our knowledge and evidence base.
Background The literature regarding clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential rise in the past year. There is substantial variability in the quality of this literature and a need to consolidate and critically review the evidence. It is with that aim that we have gathered experts from around the world to produce this International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O). Methods Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to olfaction. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review, or evidence-based review with recommendations format as dictated by available evidence and scope within the ICAR:O document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:O document was integrated and reviewed by all authors for final consensus. Results The ICAR:O document reviews nearly 100 separate topics within the realm of olfaction, including diagnosis, epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, testing, etiology, treatment, and associated pathologies. Conclusion This critical review of the existing clinical olfaction literature provides much needed insight and clarity into the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with olfactory dysfunction, while also clearly delineating gaps in our knowledge and evidence base that we should investigate further.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据