4.7 Article

Prior-Based Tensor Approximation for Anomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Imagery

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3038659

关键词

Anomaly detection; hyperspectral image; low-rank and sparse; tensor approximation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61922013, U1833203, 61421001]
  2. Beijing Information Science and Technology University Foundation [2025014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes a prior-based tensor approximation method for hyperspectral anomaly detection, which combines low-rank prior and piecewise-smooth prior into the background tensor, and incorporates spatial group sparse prior into the anomaly tensor, achieving effective anomaly detection.
The key to hyperspectral anomaly detection is to effectively distinguish anomalies from the background, especially in the case that background is complex and anomalies are weak. Hyperspectral imagery (HSI) as an image-spectrum merging cube data can be intrinsically represented as a third-order tensor that integrates spectral information and spatial information. In this article, a prior-based tensor approximation (PTA) is proposed for hyperspectral anomaly detection, in which HSI is decomposed into a background tensor and an anomaly tensor. In the background tensor, a low-rank prior is incorporated into spectral dimension by truncated nuclear norm regularization, and a piecewise-smooth prior on spatial dimension can be embedded by a linear total variation-norm regularization. For anomaly tensor, it is unfolded along spectral dimension coupled with spatial group sparse prior that can be represented by the l(2,1)-norm regularization. In the designed method, all the priors are integrated into a unified convex framework, and the anomalies can be finally determined by the anomaly tensor. Experimental results validated on several real hyperspectral data sets demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms some state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据