4.5 Article

Digital soil mapping and modeling in Loess-derived soils of Iranian Loess Plateau

期刊

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
卷 37, 期 26, 页码 11633-11651

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2060317

关键词

Exchangeable sodium percentage; environmental covariates; digital soil mapping; machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the impact of exchangeable sodium percentage on soil structure and drainage, and used multiple models for prediction and evaluation. The results indicate that sodium adsorption ratio and slope steepness are the most important factors affecting ESP.
The exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) is the parameter that causes poorly developed soil structure and weak drainage over time, subsequently increasing the dispersion of soil particles, especially silt and day, which cause soil erosion in Loess-derived soils. The number of 474 soil samples was collected within 0 to 30 cm of soil depth. Five non-linear models named Ridge regression (RidgeR), random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), cubist, and generalized boosted regression model (GBM), were considered to link several parameters with ESP in the region of approximately 2,730 ha. The mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R-2), were considered to assess the models. The RF and RidgeR algorithms were used to prioritize the variables impacting the ESP. The prediction model for mapping soil ESP had very high accuracy from RidgeR (RMSE = 0.039, R-2 = 0.99), RF (RMSE = 0.257, R2= 0.97), SVR (RMSE = 0.81, R-2 = 0.544), cubist (RMSE = 0.006, R-2 = 0.99), and GBM (RMSE = 0.426, R-2 = 0.87). The sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and slope steepness were the most important factors affecting ESP, and slope steepness was recognized as the most effective factor. We also identified that the applied models could simply assess ESP map. In addition, an action plan in different soil horizons, considering erosion and sediment processes, is efficient in controlling runoff at low ESP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据