4.6 Article

Development of 'Core Outcome Sets' for Meningioma in Clinical Studies (The COSMIC Project): protocol for two systematic literature reviews, eDelphi surveys and online consensus meetings

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Oncology

Opportunities and challenges for the development of core outcome sets in neuro-oncology

Christopher P. Millward et al.

Summary: Core Outcome Sets (COS) define minimum outcomes to be measured and reported in clinical trials for a specific health condition/area. Development of COS in neuro-oncology may be challenging due to tumor subclassification, symptom variation, and treatment options. This review discusses the importance and challenges of developing COS specifically for neuro-oncology.

NEURO-ONCOLOGY (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The PRISMA statement was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report the purpose, methods, and findings of their reviews. The updated PRISMA 2020 statement includes new reporting guidance, a 27-item checklist, an abstract checklist, and revised flow diagrams for reviews.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Review Oncology

The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary

David N. Louis et al.

Summary: The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System integrates molecular diagnostics into CNS tumor classification, introduces different approaches to tumor nomenclature and grading, and emphasizes the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports.

NEURO-ONCOLOGY (2021)

Article Oncology

EANO guideline on the diagnosis and management of meningiomas

Roland Goldbrunner et al.

Summary: Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors with varied management approaches due to limited controlled clinical trials. Advances in molecular genetics have helped refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Neuroimaging is typically used for provisional diagnosis, with surgery often required for definitive diagnosis according to WHO classification.

NEURO-ONCOLOGY (2021)

Letter Health Care Sciences & Services

Response changes in Delphi processes: why is it important to provide high-quality feedback to Delphi participants?

Dmitry Khodyakov et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Vicarious thinking was a key driver of score change in Delphi surveys for COS development and is facilitated by feedback of results

Rebecca Fish et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Delphi procedure in core outcome set development: rating scale and consensus criteria determined outcome selection

Dorien De Meyer et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items: the COS-STAP Statement

Jamie J. Kirkham et al.

TRIALS (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys

Elizabeth Gorgon et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Letter Clinical Neurology

Establishing the role of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in glioma and meningioma surgery

Michael D. Jenkinson et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY (2019)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes

Amber E. Young et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery

Susanna Dodd et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)

Article Clinical Neurology

Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from NRG Oncology RTOG 0539

Leland Rogers et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY (2018)

Review Medicine, Research & Experimental

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

Paula R. Williamson et al.

TRIALS (2017)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations

Jamie J. Kirkham et al.

PLOS MEDICINE (2017)

Article Clinical Neurology

A national survey of the management of patients with incidental meningioma in the United Kingdom

Mujtaba H. Mohammad et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY (2017)

Article Clinical Neurology

Health-related quality of life of cranial WHO grade I meningioma patients: are current questionnaires relevant?

Amir H. Zamanipoor Najafabadi et al.

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA (2017)

Review Oncology

EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas

Roland Goldbrunner et al.

LANCET ONCOLOGY (2016)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development

T. Keeley et al.

TRIALS (2016)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

Mourad Ouzzani et al.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2016)

Review Clinical Neurology

Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review

Leland Rogers et al.

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY (2015)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Developing core outcomes sets: methods for identifying and including patient-reported outcomes (PROs)

Rhiannon C. Macefield et al.

TRIALS (2014)

Editorial Material Medicine, Research & Experimental

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider

Paula R. Williamson et al.

TRIALS (2012)

Article Nursing

Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique

F Hasson et al.

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING (2000)