4.6 Article

Does the presence of general practitioners in emergency departments affect quality and safety in English NHS hospitals? A retrospective observational study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055976

关键词

health policy; accident & emergency medicine; primary care; health economics

资金

  1. National Institute of Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme [15/145/04, 15/145/06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A retrospective observational study was conducted to measure the impact of general practitioner services in emergency departments (GPEDs) in NHS hospitals in England. The study found no adverse effects on patient outcomes and no evidence to support the hypothesized benefits of placing GPs in emergency settings, except for a marginal reduction in unplanned reattendances.
Objectives Emergency departments (EDs) in NHS hospitals in England have faced considerable increases in demand over recent years. Most hospitals have developed general practitioner services in emergency departments (GPEDs) to treat non-emergency patients, aiming to relieve pressure on other staff and to improve ED efficiency and patient experience. We measured the impact of GPED services on patient flows, health outcomes and ED workload. Design Retrospective observational study. Differences in GPED service availability across EDs and time of day were used to identify the causal effect of GPED, as patients attending the ED at the same hour of the day are quasi-randomly assigned to treatment or control groups based on their local ED's service availability. Participants Attendances to 40 EDs in English NHS hospitals from April 2018 to March 2019, 4 441 349 observations. Primary and secondary outcomes measured Outcomes measured were volume of attendances, 'non-urgent' attendances, waiting times over 4 hours, patients leaving without being treated, unplanned reattendances within 7 days, inpatient admissions and 30-day mortality. Results We found a small, statistically significant reduction in unplanned reattendances within 7 days (OR 0.968, 95% CI 0.948 to 0.989), equivalent to 302 fewer reattendances per year for the average ED. The clinical impact of this was judged to be negligible. There was no detectable impact on any other outcome measure. Conclusions We found no adverse effects on patient outcomes; neither did we find any evidence of the hypothesised benefits of placing GPs in emergency settings beyond a marginal reduction in reattendances that was not considered clinically significant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据