4.6 Article

Implementation and staff understanding of shared decision-making in the context of recovery-oriented care across US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units: a mixed-methods evaluation

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057300

关键词

PSYCHIATRY; Depression & mood disorders; Schizophrenia & psychotic disorders

资金

  1. VA Health Services Research and Development (HSRD) [IIR 15-300]
  2. VA HSRD CDA [16-153]
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication (CIN) [13-416]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the understanding and practice of shared decision-making (SDM) in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units. The results suggest that the implementation of SDM is feasible in these units. However, there is a gap between understanding and practice, highlighting the need for ongoing implementation support for SDM. The study also emphasizes the importance of patient autonomy and creating a supporting and empowering environment for SDM.
Objectives To examine the understanding and practice of shared decision-making (SDM) within the context of recovery-oriented care across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) inpatient mental healthcare units. Design VHA inpatient mental health units were scored on the Recovery-Oriented Acute Inpatient Scale (RAIN). Scores on the RAIN item for medication SDM were used to rank each site from lowest to highest. The top 7 and bottom 8 sites (n=15) were selected for additional analyses using a mixed-methods approach, involving qualitative interviews, observation notes and quantitative data. Setting 34 VHA inpatient mental health units located in every geographical region of the USA. Participants 55 treatment team members. Results Our results identified an overarching theme of 'power-sharing' that describes participants' conceptualisation and practice of medication decision-making. Three levels of power sharing emerged from both interview and observational data: (1) No power sharing: patients are excluded from treatment decisions; (2) Limited power sharing: patients are informed of treatment decisions but have limited influence on the decision-making process; and (3) Shared-power: patients and providers work collaboratively and contribute to medication decisions. Comparing interview to observational data, only observational data indicating those themes differentiate top from bottom scoring sites on the RAIN SDM item scores. All but one top scoring sites indicated shared power medication decision processes, whereas bottom sites reflected mostly no power sharing. Additionally, our findings highlight three key factors that facilitate the implementation of SDM: inclusion of veteran in treatment teams, patient education and respect for patient autonomy. Conclusions Implementation of SDM appears feasible in acute inpatient mental health units. Although most participants were well informed about SDM, that knowledge did not always translate into practice, which supports the need for ongoing implementation support for SDM. Additional contextual factors underscore the value of patients' self-determination as a guiding principle for SDM, highlighting the role of a supporting, empowering and autonomy-generating environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据