4.6 Article

Status migrainosus inpatient treatment with eptinezumab (SMITE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059647

关键词

migraine; health economics; clinical trials

资金

  1. Lundbeck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab compared to intravenous lidocaine in the treatment of status migrainosus. The study will include 40 patients who will be randomly assigned to receive either eptinezumab or intravenous lidocaine. The primary outcome measure is the time from infusion until resolution of pain, and several secondary measures will also be evaluated, including changes in health resource utilization and patient reported outcomes of migraine disability. The study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee and informed consent will be obtained from all participants.
Introduction Status migrainosus is a disabling complication of migraine, which frequently results in hospitalisation. For patients who fail to respond to simple analgesia, triptans and intravenous prochlorperazine or chlorpromazine, there are limited treatment options, and a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice. Eptinezumab, an intravenous monoclonal antibody specific for the calcitonin gene-related peptide ligand which achieves maximal plasma concentration immediately following administration and may improve migraines from day one. Intravenous lignocaine is an anaesthetic medication used in treatment of status migrainosus, often requiring prolonged admissions and with potential cardiac adverse events. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in the treatment of status migrainosus in comparison to intravenous lidocaine. Methods and analysis Status migrainosus inpatient treatment with eptinezumab is a randomised, controlled, single-centre clinical trial conducted in a parallel design with an active comparator conducted in Melbourne, Australia. This study randomises forty patients (1:1) to receive either eptinezumab or an infusion of intravenous lignocaine for up to 5 days. It will assess the effect of eptinezumab compared with intravenous lignocaine in aborting status migrainosus, with the primary outcome of time from infusion until resolution of pain. It will explore several secondary measures including change in health resource utilisation, effect on patient reported outcomes of migraine disability and the safety and tolerability of each medication. Ethics and dissemination This study has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Alfred Health, local reference number 443/21, and all participants will provide informed consent for participation in the trial and dissemination of results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据