4.4 Article

Outcomes and risk factors for delayed-onset postoperative respiratory failure: a multi-center case-control study by the University of California Critical Care Research Collaborative (UC3RC)

期刊

BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01681-x

关键词

Respiratory failure; Postoperative; Risk factors; Surgical outcomes; Elective surgery; Matched case-control study; AHRQ PSI 11

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [NCATS], National Institutes of Health [NIH] [UL1 TR000002]
  2. American Association of Critical Care Nurses (AACN) [20297]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [A21-3192, R25HL126140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This retrospective study investigated late postoperative respiratory failure (L-PRF) occurring six or more days after elective surgery. It found that pre-existing neurologic disease, longer anesthesia duration, and higher maximum intraoperative peak inspiratory pressures were associated with L-PRF, leading to higher morbidity and mortality, longer hospital and ICU stay, and increased costs. These factors may be targets for future interventions.
Background Few interventions are known to reduce the incidence of respiratory failure that occurs following elective surgery (postoperative respiratory failure; PRF). We previously reported risk factors associated with PRF that occurs within the first 5 days after elective surgery (early PRF; E-PRF); however, PRF that occurs six or more days after elective surgery (late PRF; L-PRF) likely represents a different entity. We hypothesized that L-PRF would be associated with worse outcomes and different risk factors than E-PRF. Methods This was a retrospective matched case-control study of 59,073 consecutive adult patients admitted for elective non-cardiac and non-pulmonary surgical procedures at one of five University of California academic medical centers between October 2012 and September 2015. We identified patients with L-PRF, confirmed by surgeon and intensivist subject matter expert review, and matched them 1:1 to patients who did not develop PRF (No-PRF) based on hospital, age, and surgical procedure. We then analyzed risk factors and outcomes associated with L-PRF compared to E-PRF and No-PRF. Results Among 95 patients with L-PRF, 50.5% were female, 71.6% white, 27.4% Hispanic, and 53.7% Medicare recipients; the median age was 63 years (IQR 56, 70). Compared to 95 matched patients with No-PRF and 319 patients who developed E-PRF, L-PRF was associated with higher morbidity and mortality, longer hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, and increased costs. Compared to No-PRF, factors associated with L-PRF included: preexisiting neurologic disease (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.81-10.46), anesthesia duration per hour (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44), and maximum intraoperative peak inspiratory pressure per cm H(2)0 (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.22). Conclusions We identified that pre-existing neurologic disease, longer duration of anesthesia, and greater maximum intraoperative peak inspiratory pressures were associated with respiratory failure that developed six or more days after elective surgery in adult patients (L-PRF). Interventions targeting these factors may be worthy of future evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据