4.7 Article

Fragment-Directed Random Mutagenesis by the Reverse Kunkel Method

期刊

ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 1658-1668

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00086

关键词

random mutagenesis; site-directed mutagenesis; Kunkel method; protein engineering; affinity maturation; phage display; yeast surface display

资金

  1. Academia Sinica Career Development Award [AS-CDA-108-L07]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [107-2113-M-001-013, 110-2113-M-001-064-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a unique mutagenesis method called the reverse Kunkel method, which combines the advantages of user-defined mutagenesis and random mutagenesis. By coupling with phage display and yeast display selections, the method successfully generates improved antibodies with enhanced affinity and immunostaining performance.
Two fundamentally different approaches are routinely used for protein engineering: user-defined mutagenesis and random mutagenesis, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Here, we invent a unique mutagenesis protocol, which combines the advantages of user-defined mutagenesis and random mutagenesis. The new method, termed the reverse Kunkel method, allows the user to create random mutations at multiple specified regions in a one-pot reaction. We demonstrated the reverse Kunkel method by mimicking the somatic hypermutation in antibodies that introduces random mutations concentrated in complementarity-determining regions. Coupling with the phage display and yeast display selections, we successfully generated dramatically improved antibodies against a model protein and a neurotransmitter peptide in terms of affinity and immunostaining performance. The reverse Kunkel method is especially suitable for engineering proteins whose activities are determined by multiple variable regions, such as antibodies and adeno-associated virus capsids, or whose functional domains are composed of several discontinuous sequences, such as Cas9 and Cas12a.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据