4.7 Article

Metabolic tumor burden is associated with major oncogenomic alterations and serum tumor markers in patients with resected pancreatic cancer

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 360, 期 2, 页码 227-233

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.02.014

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; Metabolic tumor burden; Gene mutation; Serum tumor markers

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172276, 81372651, 81201900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive and lethal disease with an overall 5-year survival rate of only 5%. Studies have demonstrated the ability of F-18-fludrodeoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to measure the metabolic tumor burden in patients with various tumors, including pancreatic cancer. In a previous study, we investigated the predictive significance of the metabolic tumor burden in terms of the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). In this study, we analyzed the correlation between metabolic tumor burden and the status of the KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A/p16, and SMAD4/DPC4 genes. Our results showed that the metabolic tumor burden was associated with oncogenomic alterations that reflected the abnormal expression of carbohydrate metabolic enzymes (GLUT1, ALDOA and FBP1). We also identified a linear correlation between serum tumor markers and the metabolic tumor burden. To estimate the metabolic tumor burden when F-18-FDG PET/CT is not available, we used the linear regression models to establish equations for MTV and TLG using CA19-9 and CA125 as independent variables. Our results suggest that the metabolic tumor burden, as evaluated by F-18-FDG PET/CT or estimated by serum tumor markers, may be suitable for monitoring treatment response and disease progression of pancreatic cancer. Further research is needed to better understand why pancreatic cancer patients with abnormal expressions of TP53, CDKN2A/p16, and SMAD4/DPC4 get high metabolic tumor burden. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据