4.7 Article

3D Bioprinting of Living Materials for Structure-Dependent Production of Hyaluronic Acid

期刊

ACS MACRO LETTERS
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 452-459

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.2c00037

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515010696]
  2. Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen [JCYJ20190807163003704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

3D bioprinting is a promising method for enhancing the efficacy of biosynthesis in microorganisms. In this study, 3D gelatin-based hydrogels with a grid structure were printed to produce a higher yield of hyaluronic acid. The findings highlight the significant role of 3D printing in spatially controlling microorganism-laden hydrogel structures for improving biosynthesis efficiency.
3D bioprinting of living materials represents an interesting paradigm toward the efficacy enhancement for the biosynthesis of various functional compounds in microorganisms. Previous studies have shown the success of 3D-printed bioactive systems in the production of small molecular compounds. However, the feasibility of such a strategy in producing macromolecules and how the geometry of the 3D scaffold influences the productivity are still unknown. In this study, we printed a series of 3D gelatin-based hydrogels immobilized with fermentation bacteria that can secrete hyaluronic acid (HA), a very useful natural polysaccharide in the fields of biomedicine and tissue engineering. The 3D-printed bioreactor was capable of producing HA, and an elevated yield was obtained with the system bearing a grid structure compared to that either with a solid structure or in a scaffold-free fermentation condition. As for the grid structure, bioreactors with a 90 degrees strut angel and a median interfilament distance displayed the highest HA yield. Our findings highlighted the significant role of 3D printing in the spatial control of microorganism-laden hydrogel structures for the enhancement of biosynthesis efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据