4.6 Review

A review of cybersickness in head-mounted displays: raising attention to individual susceptibility

期刊

VIRTUAL REALITY
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 1409-1441

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10055-022-00638-2

关键词

Cybersickness; Virtual reality; Literature review; Individual susceptibility

资金

  1. SNF [CRSII5_180319/1]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) under the HEI-Lab center [UIDB/05380/2020]
  3. EPFL Lausanne
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UIDB/05380/2020] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cybersickness remains a significant challenge for the widespread usage of virtual reality, with inconsistent results and little attention to individual susceptibility in the research field.
Cybersickness still poses a significant challenge to the widespread usage of virtual reality, leading to different levels of discomfort and potentially breaking the immersive experience. Researchers have attempted to discover the possible fundamental causes of cybersickness for years. Despite the longstanding interest in the research field, inconsistent results have been drawn on the contributing factors and solutions to combating cybersickness. Moreover, little attention has been paid to individual susceptibility. A consolidated explanation remains under development, requiring more empirical studies with robust and reproducible methodologies. This review presents an integrated survey connecting the findings from previous review papers and the state of the art involving empirical studies and participants. A literature review is then presented, focusing on the practical studies of different contributing factors, the pros and cons of measurements, profiles of cybersickness, and solutions to reduce this phenomenon. Our findings suggest a lack of considerations regarding user susceptibility and gender balance in between groups studies. In addition, incongruities among empirical findings raised concerns. We conclude by suggesting points of insights for future empirical investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据