4.7 Review

Immune evader cancer stem cells direct the perspective approaches to cancer immunotherapy

期刊

STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13287-022-02829-9

关键词

Tumor microenvironment; Cancer stem cells; Immune evasion; CAR T cell; CAR NK cells; Nano-immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploration of tumor immunity has led to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cell-based immunotherapies, improving clinical outcomes for certain tumor types. However, the complex tumor microenvironment, cellular heterogeneity, and cancer stem cells contribute to poor clinical efficacy in other tumors. Understanding the immune features of cancer stem cells could lead to therapeutic targets for effective anti-tumor responses.
Exploration of tumor immunity leads to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and cell-based immunotherapies which improve the clinical outcomes in several tumor types. However, the poor clinical efficacy of these treatments observed for other tumors could be attributed to the inherent complex tumor microenvironment (TME), cellular heterogeneity, and stemness driven by cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSC-specific characteristics provide the bulk tumor surveillance and resistance to entire eradication upon conventional therapies. CSCs-immune cells crosstalk creates an immunosuppressive TME that reshapes the stemness in tumor cells, resulting in tumor formation and progression. Thus, identifying the immunological features of CSCs could introduce the therapeutic targets with powerful antitumor responses. In this review, we summarized the role of immune cells providing CSCs to evade tumor immunity, and then discussed the intrinsic mechanisms represented by CSCs to promote tumors' resistance to immunotherapies. Then, we outlined potent immunotherapeutic interventions followed by a perspective outlook on the use of nanomedicine-based drug delivery systems for controlled modulation of the immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据