4.7 Article

The human pathogenic 91del7 mutation in SLC34A1 has no effect in mineral homeostasis in mice

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10046-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [176125]
  2. National Center of Competence in Research NCCR Kidney.CH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kidneys play an important role in regulating phosphate homeostasis. Mutations in the SLC34A1 gene are associated with various kidney-related diseases, but the specific mutation studied here does not appear to negatively impact phosphate balance.
Kidneys are key regulators of phosphate homeostasis. Biallelic mutations of the renal Na+/phosphate cotransporter SLC34A1/NaPi-IIa cause idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia, whereas monoallelic mutations were frequently noted in adults with kidney stones. Genome-wide-association studies identified SLC34A1 as a risk locus for chronic kidney disease. Pathogenic mutations in SLC34A1 are present in 4% of the general population. Here, we characterize a mouse model carrying the 91del7 in-frame deletion, a frequent mutation whose significance remains unclear. Under normal dietary conditions, 12 weeks old heterozygous and homozygous males have similar plasma and urinary levels of phosphate as their wild type (WT) littermates, and comparable concentrations of parathyroid hormone, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) and 1,25(OH)(2) vitamin D-3. Renal phosphate transport, and expression of NaPi-IIa and NaPi-IIc cotransporters, was indistinguishable in the three genotypes. Challenging mice with low dietary phosphate did not result in differences between genotypes with regard to urinary and plasma phosphate. Urinary and plasma phosphate, plasma FGF-23 and expression of cotransporters were similar in all genotypes after weaning. Urinary phosphate and bone mineral density were also comparable in 300 days old WT and mutant mice. In conclusion, mice carrying the 91del7 truncation do not show signs of impaired phosphate homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据