4.7 Article

Fusion of expert uncertain assessment in FMEA based on the negation of basic probability assignment and evidence distance

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12360-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2020YFB1711900]
  2. NWPU Research Fund for Young Scholars [G2022WD01010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is widely used for potential risk modeling and management. This paper proposes an improved risk analysis method based on triangular fuzzy numbers, the negation of basic probability assignment (BPA) and the evidence distance in the frame of Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. The method addresses the issues of uncertainty handling and weight modeling, and is applied to analyze the failure modes of aircraft turbine blades.
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) has been widely used for potential risk modeling and management. Expert evaluation is used to model the risk priority number to determine the risk level of different failure modes. Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory is an effective method for uncertain information modeling and has been adopted to address the uncertainty in FMEA. How to deal with conflicting evidence from different experts is an open issue. At the same time, different professional backgrounds of experts may lead to different weights in modeling the evaluation. How to model the relative weight of an expert is an important problem. We propose an improved risk analysis method based on triangular fuzzy numbers, the negation of basic probability assignment (BPA) and the evidence distance in the frame of D-S evidence theory. First, we summarize and organize the expert's risk analysis results. Then, we model the expert's assessments based on the triangular fuzzy numbers as BPAs and calculate the negation of BPAs. Third, we model the weight of expert based on the evidence distance in the evidence theory. Finally, the Murphy's combination rule is used to fuse the risk assessment results of different experts and calculate the new risk priority number (RPN). At the end of this paper, we apply the proposed method to analyze seventeen failure modes of aircraft turbine blades. The experimental results verify the rationality and effectiveness of this method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据