4.7 Article

Significance of borderline HbA2 levels in β thalassemia carrier screening

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09250-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology- Government of India
  2. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased HbA(2) levels are typical in beta-thalassemia carriers, but some carriers have borderline HbA(2) levels. This study identified the determinants of borderline HbA(2) levels in 205 individuals and found that genetic factors play a role in this condition.
Increased HbA(2) levels are the characteristic feature of beta-thalassemia carriers. A subset of carriers however do not show HbA(2) levels in the typical carrier range (>= 4.0%) but show borderline HbA(2) levels. As a result, these carriers escape diagnosis and carry the risk of having beta-thalassemia major offspring. Borderline HbA(2) values may occur as a consequence of mild beta-thalassemia mutations, co-inherited beta-thalassemia and alpha- or delta- thalassemia or iron deficiency anemia. However, there is insufficient knowledge regarding the cause of borderline HbA(2) levels in specific populations. This study aimed to identify the determinants of borderline HbA(2) levels (which we have considered as HbA(2) 3.0-3.9%) in 205 individuals. Primary screening involved detecting the presence of iron deficiency anemia followed by molecular analysis of alpha, beta and delta globin genes. Remarkably, 168 of 205 individuals were positive for a defect. 87% (149/168) of positive individuals were heterozygous for beta thalassemia with (59/149) or without (90/149) the presence of co-existing IDA, alpha or delta gene defects. Notably, 20 of 149 beta thalassemia carriers showed HbA(2) < 3.5% and MCV > 80fL. 7 of these 20 carriers were married to carriers of hemoglobinopathies. Our findings describe the genetic basis of borderline HbA(2) levels and emphasize the necessity of a molecular diagnosis in these individuals in the routine clinical setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据