4.7 Article

PPP6C, a serine-threonine phosphatase, regulates melanocyte differentiation and contributes to melanoma tumorigenesis through modulation of MITF activity

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08936-0

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have identified PPP6C as a key regulator of MITF, a lineage specific transcription factor in melanocytes and an oncogene in melanoma. Inactivation of PPP6C increases MITF expression and target gene expression, decreases sensitivity to BRAF inhibition, and may serve as a potential drug target for melanoma.
It is critical to understand the molecular mechanisms governing the regulation of MITF, a lineage specific transcription factor in melanocytes and an oncogene in melanoma. We identified PPP6C, a serine/threonine phosphatase, as a key regulator of MITF in melanoma. PPP6C is the only recurrently mutated serine/threonine phosphatase across all human cancers identified in sequencing studies and the recurrent R264C mutation occurs exclusively in melanoma. Using a zebrafish developmental model system, we demonstrate that PPP6C expression disrupts melanocyte differentiation. Melanocyte disruption was rescued by engineering phosphomimetic mutations at serine residues on MITF. We developed an in vivo MITF promoter assay in zebrafish and studied the effects of PPP6C(R264C) on regulating MITF promoter activity. Expression of PPP6C(R264C) cooperated with oncogenic NRAS(Q61K) to accelerate melanoma initiation in zebrafish, consistent with a gain of function alteration. Using a human melanoma cell line, we examined the requirement for PPP6C in proliferation and MITF expression. We show that genetic inactivation of PPP6C increases MITF and target gene expression, decreases sensitivity to BRAF inhibition, and increases phosphorylated MITF in a BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma cell line. Our data suggests that PPP6C may be a relevant drug target in melanoma and proposes a mechanism for its action.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据