4.7 Article

Salmonella Salamae and S. Waycross isolated from Nile perch in Lake Victoria show limited human pathogenic potential

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08200-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) [14-P01-TAN]
  2. Conselleria de Cultura, Educacion e Ordenacion Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia [ED481B-2018/018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-enterica subspecies of Salmonella enterica are rarely associated with human infections. However, food safety legislations consider the entire genus Salmonella as pathogenic to humans. A study on Salmonella strains isolated from Nile perch found that they have low pathogenicity, suggesting the need to revisit food legislations and actions taken on findings of Salmonella to avoid wasting valuable food.
Non-enterica subspecies of Salmonella enterica are rarely associated with human infections. Paradoxically, food safety legislations consider the entire genus Salmonella as pathogenic to humans. Globally, large amounts of seafoods are rejected and wasted due to findings of Salmonella. To inform better food safety decisions, we investigated the pathogenicity of Salmonella Salamae 42:r- and Salmonella Waycross isolated from Nile perch from Lake Victoria. Genome-wide analysis revealed absence of significant virulence determinants including on key Salmonella pathogenicity islands in both serovars. In epithelial cells, S. Salamae showed a weak invasion ability that was lower than the invH mutant of S. Typhimiurium used as negative control. Similarly, S. Salamae could not replicate inside macrophages. Moreover, intracellular replication in S. Waycross strains was significantly lower compared to the wild type S. Typhimurium. Our findings suggest a low pathogenicity of S. Salamae reinforcing the existing literature that non-enterica subspecies are avirulent. We propose that food legislations and actions taken on findings of Salmonella are revisited to avoid wasting valuable sea- and other foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据