4.7 Article

Reticulate evolution in the Pteris fauriei group (Pteridaceae)

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11390-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST 105-2311-B-037-003, MOST106-2311-B-037-005-MY3]
  2. Kaohsiung Medical University Research Foundation [KMU-M111017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pteris fauriei group, widely distributed in Eastern Asia, exhibits a complicated evolutionary relationship and rich genetic diversity. The presence of hybrid taxa adds to the morphological complexity and taxonomic difficulties of this group. Hybrids have broader ranges and more populations compared to parental taxa, showing divergent phenotypes and ecological fidelities. Apogamy, a form of asexual reproduction, is common in this group and contributes to its sustainability.
The Pteris fauriei group (Pteridaceae) has a wide distribution in Eastern Asia and includes 18 species with similar but varied morphology. We collected more than 300 specimens of the P. fauriei group and determined ploidy by flow cytometry and inferred phylogenies by molecular analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers. Our results reveal a complicated reticulate evolution, consisting of seven parental taxa and 58 hybrids. The large number of hybrid taxa have added significant morphological complexity to the group leading to difficult taxonomic issues. The hybrids generally had broader ranges and more populations than their parental taxa. Genetic combination of different pairs of parental species created divergent phenotypes of hybrids, exhibited by both morphological characteristics and ecological fidelities. Niche novelty could facilitate hybrid speciation. Apogamy is common in this group and potentially contributes to the sustainability of the whole group. We propose that frequent hybridizations among members of the P. fauriei group generate and maintain genetic diversity, via novel genetic combinations, niche differentiation, and apogamy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据