4.7 Article

Prediction of topological Dirac semimetal in Ca-based Zintl layered compounds CaM2X2 (M = Zn or Cd; X = N, P, As, Sb, or Bi)

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08370-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Theoretical Sciences
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST-107-2628-M-110-001-MY3, MOST-110-2112-M-110-013-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through the study of Zintl compounds CaM2X2, it was discovered that CaM2Bi2 (M = Zn or Cd) is a new type of topological crystalline insulator with four-fold degenerate Dirac points. These findings provide a new field for the search of new topological materials.
Topological Dirac materials are attracting a lot of attention because they offer exotic physical phenomena. An exhaustive search coupled with first-principles calculations was implemented to investigate 10 Zintl compounds with a chemical formula of CaM2X2 (M = Zn or Cd, X = N, P, As, Sb, or Bi) under three crystal structures: CaAl2Si2-, ThCr2Si2-, and BaCu2S2-type crystal phases. All of the materials were found to energetically prefer the CaAl2Si2-type structure based on total ground state energy calculations. Symmetry-based indicators are used to evaluate their topological properties. Interestingly, we found that CaM2Bi2 (M = Zn or Cd) are topological crystalline insulators. Further calculations under the hybrid functional approach and analysis using k center dot p model reveal that they exhibit topological Dirac semimetal (TDSM) states, where the four-fold degenerate Dirac points are located along the high symmetry line in-between Gamma to A points. These findings are verified through Green's function surface state calculations under HSE06. Finally, phonon spectra calculations revealed that CaCd2Bi2 is thermodynamically stable. The Zintl phase of AM(2)X(2) compounds have not been identified in any topological material databases, thus can be a new playground in the search for new topological materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据