4.7 Article

Predicting target-ligand interactions with graph convolutional networks for interpretable pharmaceutical discovery

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12180-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Microsoft AI for Health
  2. UniAndes-DeepMind Scholarship 2021
  3. Universidad de los Andes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug Discovery is a challenging research area with high costs and low returns. In this study, a deep learning-based approach called PLA-Net is proposed to predict target-ligand interactions more effectively. By considering the relevant chemical information of ligands and targets and utilizing adversarial augmentations, PLA-Net achieves high precision in interaction prediction.
Drug Discovery is an active research area that demands great investments and generates low returns due to its inherent complexity and great costs. To identify potential therapeutic candidates more effectively, we propose protein-ligand with adversarial augmentations network (PLA-Net), a deep learning-based approach to predict target-ligand interactions. PLA-Net consists of a two-module deep graph convolutional network that considers ligands' and targets' most relevant chemical information, successfully combining them to find their binding capability. Moreover, we generate adversarial data augmentations that preserve relevant biological backgrounds and improve the interpretability of our model, highlighting the relevant substructures of the ligands reported to interact with the protein targets. Our experiments demonstrate that the joint ligand-target information and the adversarial augmentations significantly increase the interaction prediction performance. PLA-Net achieves 86.52% in mean average precision for 102 target proteins with perfect performance for 30 of them, in a curated version of actives as decoys dataset. Lastly, we accurately predict pharmacologically-relevant molecules when screening the ligands of ChEMBL and drug repurposing Hub datasets with the perfect-scoring targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据