4.7 Article

Predicting outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation with CT-based radiomics

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10175-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Duke-NUS Oncology Academic Clinical Programme [08/FY2020/EX(SL)/76-A152, 08/FY2019/EX(SL)/65-A111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A feasibility study investigated the role of CT-based radiomics in predicting treatment response and survival rates in rectal cancer patients. By constructing NAR and survival models, radiomics features were found to be more accurate in predicting outcomes. CTV radiomics features were especially important in NAR prediction.
A feasibility study was performed to determine if CT-based radiomics could play an augmentative role in predicting neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR), locoregional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The NAR score, which takes into account the pathological tumour and nodal stage as well as clinical tumour stage, is a validated surrogate endpoint used for early determination of treatment response whereby a low NAR score (< 8) has been correlated with better outcomes and high NAR score (> 16) has been correlated with poorer outcomes. CT images of 191 patients with LARC were used in this study. Primary tumour (GTV) and mesorectum (CTV) were contoured separately and radiomics features were extracted from both segments. Two NAR models (NAR > 16 and NAR < 8) models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and the survival models were constructed using regularized Cox regressions. Area under curve (AUC) and time-dependent AUC were used to quantify the performance of the LASSO and Cox regression respectively, using ten folds cross validations. The NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models have an average AUCs of 0.68 +/- 0.13 and 0.59 +/- 0.14 respectively. There are statistically significant differences between the clinical and combined model for LRFFS (from 0.68 +/- 0.04 to 0.72 +/- 0.04), DMFS (from 0.68 +/- 0.05 to 0.70 +/- 0.05) and OS (from 0.64 +/- 0.06 to 0.66 +/- 0.06). CTV radiomics features were also found to be more important than GTV features in the NAR prediction model. The most important clinical features are age and CEA for NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models respectively, while the most significant clinical features are age, surgical margin and NAR score across all the four survival models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据