4.7 Article

An original approach to measure ligand/receptor binding affinity in non-purified samples

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09217-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. New Aquitaine region
  2. ANR polyFADO
  3. ANR CROSS
  4. science and technology for health department of University of Bordeaux

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel experimental procedure using microscale thermophoresis (MST) directly from cell membrane fragments was developed to determine ligand binding affinities to membrane proteins. The procedure overcame the challenge of purification and successfully determined the concentration and binding affinity of the dopamine D2 receptor.
Several biochemical and biophysical methods are available to determine ligand binding affinities between a biological target and its ligands, most of which require purification, labelling or surface immobilisation. These measurements, however, remain challenging in regards to membrane proteins, as purification processes require their extraction from their native lipid environment, which may in turn impact receptor conformation and functionality. In this study, we have developed a novel experimental procedure using microscale thermophoresis (MST) directly from cell membrane fragments, to determine different ligand binding affinities to a membrane protein, the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R). In order to achieve this, two main challenges had to be overcome: determining the concentration of dopamine D2R in the crude sample; finding ways to minimize or account for non-specific binding of the ligand to cell fragments. Using MST, we were able to determine the D2R concentration in cell membrane fragments to approximately 36.8 +/- 2.6 pmol/mg. Next, the doses-responses curves allowed for the determination of K-D, to approximately 5.3 +/- 1.7 nM, which is very close to the reported value. Important details of the experimental procedure have been detailed in this paper to allow the application of this novel method to various membrane proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据