4.7 Review

Availability of Healthy Food and Beverages in Hospital Outlets and Interventions in the UK and USA to Improve the Hospital Food Environment: A Systematic Narrative Literature Review

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14081566

关键词

food environment; healthy diet; hospital; systematic review; narrative synthesis

资金

  1. Newcastle University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review examines the availability of healthy food and beverages in hospitals and identifies interventions that positively impact the hospital food environment. Through the analysis of 40 relevant publications, it concludes that the overall quality of hospital food environments varies. Educational, labelling, financial, and choice architecture interventions are shown to improve the hospital food environment and/or dietary intake of consumers.
The aims of this systematic review are to determine the availability of healthy food and beverages in hospitals and identify interventions that positively influence the hospital food environment, thereby improving the dietary intake of employees and visitors. Embase, Medline, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, Google Scholar and Google were used to identify publications. Publications relating to the wider hospital food environment in the UK and USA were considered eligible, while those regarding food available to in-patients were excluded. Eligible publications (n = 40) were explored using a narrative synthesis. Risk of bias and research quality were assessed using the Quality Criteria Checklist for Primary Research. Although limited by the heterogeneity of study designs, this review concludes that the overall quality of hospital food environments varies. Educational, labelling, financial and choice architecture interventions were shown to improve the hospital food environment and/or dietary intake of consumers. Implementing pre-existing initiatives improved food environments, but multi-component interventions had some undesirable effects, such as reduced fruit and vegetable intake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据