4.7 Article

The Inverse Correlation of Isoflavone Dietary Intake and Headache in Peri- and Post-Menopausal Women

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14061226

关键词

menopause; isoflavone; daidzein; genistein; headache

资金

  1. Ibaraki Prefecture [91AA193108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationship between dietary consumption of various nutrients and headaches in middle-aged women. It found that higher intake of isoflavones was associated with a lower frequency of headaches in peri- and post-menopausal women, suggesting that a diet rich in isoflavones may help improve headaches in middle-aged women.
This study investigated the relationship between headache and dietary consumption of a variety of nutrients in middle-aged women. This cross-sectional analysis used first-visit records of 405 women aged 40-59 years. The frequency of headaches was assessed using the Menopausal Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire. Of the 43 major nutrient intakes surveyed using the brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire, those that were not shared between women with and without frequent headaches were selected. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify nutrients independently associated with frequent headaches. After adjusting for background factors related to frequent headache (vasomotor, insomnia, anxiety, and depression symptoms), the estimated dietary intake of isoflavones (daidzein + genistein) (mg/1000 kcal/day) was negatively associated with frequent headaches (adjusted odds, 0.974; 95% confidence interval, 0.950-0.999). Moreover, the estimated isoflavone intake was not significantly associated with headache frequency in the premenopausal group, whereas it significantly correlated with that in the peri- and post-menopausal groups. Headache in peri- and post-menopausal women was inversely correlated with the dietary intake of isoflavones. Diets rich in isoflavones may improve headaches in middle-aged women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据