4.7 Review

Celiac Disease and Thrombotic Events: Systematic Review of Published Cases

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14102162

关键词

gluten-sensitive enteropathy; celiac disease; thrombotic events; thromboembolism; thrombosis; hypercoagulability; extraintestinal celiac manifestations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our study reviewed 55 cases of thrombotic events in patients with celiac disease, finding that the majority of patients were unaware of their CD diagnosis before thrombosis occurred. Most of the patients received some form of anticoagulation treatment along with a gluten-free diet.
Extraintestinal manifestations of celiac disease (CD) should be considered, even in patients without typical intestinal symptoms. The aim of our study is to examine the literature regarding the occurrence of thrombotic events in CD, and to synthesize the data from case reports and case series. A systematic review of the literature was conducted by searching the Pub-Med/MEDLINE database, from the date of database inception to January 2022, to identify published cases and case series on this topic, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 55 cases were included in the study. The majority of patients were previously healthy individuals, with no comorbidities. In less than one-third of the cases (30.91%), the diagnosis of CD was established before the onset of thrombosis, while in the remaining cases (34.54%), thrombosis preceded the diagnosis or was diagnosed concomitantly with CD. The most common sites for thrombosis occurrence were hepatic veins (30.91%), while thrombosis of cerebral blood vessels, deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities, and pulmonary thromboembolism were less frequent. Thrombosis was most commonly isolated to one site only (78.18%). In 69.09% of cases (n = 38), some form of anticoagulation, along with a gluten-free diet, was initiated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据