4.8 Article

Stratospheric ozone depletion and tropospheric ozone increases drive Southern Ocean interior warming

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 365-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-022-01320-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. US National Science Foundation [AGS-2053121, OCE 2123422]
  3. Centre for Southern Hemisphere Oceans Research (CSHOR) - Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (QNLM, China)
  4. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO, Australia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric ozone changes in the stratosphere and troposphere have contributed to warming in the Southern Ocean, with tropospheric ozone changes being more important. Tropospheric increases primarily cause subsurface warming through the deepening of isopycnals, while stratospheric ozone causes depletion via spiciness changes along isopycnals.
Atmospheric ozone has undergone distinct changes in the stratosphere and troposphere during the second half of the twentieth century, with depletion in the stratosphere and an increase in the troposphere. Until now, the effect of these changes on ocean heat uptake has been unclear. Here we show that both stratospheric and tropospheric ozone changes have contributed to Southern Ocean interior warming with the latter being more important. The ozone changes between 1955 and 2000 induced about 30% of the net simulated ocean heat content increase in the upper 2,000 m of the Southern Ocean, with around 60% attributed to tropospheric increases and 40% to stratospheric depletion. Moreover, these two warming contributions show distinct physical mechanisms: tropospheric ozone increases cause a subsurface warming in the Southern Ocean primarily via the deepening of isopycnals, while stratospheric ozone causes depletion via spiciness changes along isopycnals. Our results highlight that tropospheric ozone is more than an air pollutant and, as a greenhouse gas, has been pivotal to the Southern Ocean warming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据