4.6 Article

Continuous on-board behaviour classification using accelerometry: A case study with a new GPS-3G-Bluetooth system in Pacific black ducks

期刊

METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 1429-1435

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.13878

关键词

accelerometer; machine learning; time-activity budget; wildlife tracking; XGBoost

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accelerometer data have become increasingly important for studying animal behaviors and energetics over the past two decades. However, the large amount of raw data can be burdensome in terms of storage and power consumption. On-board data processing and compression have shown great potential in reducing these problems and opening up new possibilities for ecological and behavioral research.
Over the past two decades, accelerometer (ACC) data have been increasingly used to study animal behaviours and energetics. However, the large amount of raw ACC data can be a burden to device storage and power consumption and in many cases may also require device retrieval for data collection. On-board data processing to reduce data volume and power consumption for data transmission may hold promise to alleviate these problems and allow for next-generation, smart trackers. We developed a tracking system processing raw ACC data on-board of trackers into behaviours using an XGBoost machine learning model. We used this system on six free-ranging Pacific black ducks Anas superciliosa to study eight behaviours every 2 s. The on-board XGBoost model for behaviour classification had 92.04% overall accuracy. One day of continuous behaviour records was compressed on-board to as little as 17.28 kB for routine transmission via the 3G network. We received behaviour data from the six ducks continuously for periods ranging between 56 days and 14 months. On-board processing of raw ACC data and data transmission proofed highly energy efficient and came at a minimal weight cost to the trackers, providing great potential to open up new areas in ecological and behavioural research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据