4.3 Article

Hip-Extensor Strength, Trunk Posture, and Use of the Knee-Extensor Muscles During Running

期刊

JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING
卷 51, 期 7, 页码 519-524

出版社

NATL ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.8.05

关键词

energetics; kinetics; gait

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Diminished hip-muscle performance has been proposed to contribute to various knee injuries. Objective: To determine the association between hip-extensor muscle strength and sagittal-plane trunk posture and the relationships among hip-extensor muscle strength and hip and knee-extensor work during running. Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Setting: Musculoskeletal biomechanical laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 40 asymptomatic recreational runners, 20 men (age = 27.1 +/- 7.0 years, height = 1.74 +/- 0.69 m, mass = 71.1 +/- 8.2 kg) and 20 women (age = 26.2 +/- 5.8 years, height = 1.65 +/- 0.74 m, mass = 60.6 +/- 6.6 kg), participated. Main Outcome Measure(s): Maximum isometric strength of the hip extensors was assessed using a dynamometer. Sagittal-plane trunk posture (calculated relative to the global vertical axis) and hip-and knee-extensor work (sum of energy absorption and generation) during the stance phase of running were quantified while participants ran over ground at a controlled speed of 3.4 m/s. We used Pearson product moment correlations to examine the relationships among hip-extensor strength, mean sagittal-plane trunk-flexion angle, hip-extensor work, and knee-extensor work. Results: Hip-extensor strength was correlated positively with trunk-flexion angle (r = 0.55, P < .001) and hip-extensor work (r = 0.46, P = .003). It was correlated inversely with kneeextensor work (r = -0.39, P = .01). All the correlations remained after adjusting for sex. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that runners with hip-extensor weakness used a more upright trunk posture. This strategy led to an overreliance on the knee extensors and may contribute to overuse running injuries at the knee.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据