4.6 Article

Characterization of Organosolv Lignins and Their Application in the Preparation of Aerogels

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15082861

关键词

aerogel; lignin; hydrogels; functional polymer; biomass; supercritical drying

资金

  1. ERDF
  2. Estonian Research Council [RESTA11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The production of novel materials and value-added chemicals from lignin has received significant attention in recent years. Lignin, due to its abundant occurrence in nature, has been identified as a potential feedstock for the production of functional materials such as aerogels. This study focuses on the preparation and characterization of lignin-based aerogels using different types of lignocellulosic biomass. The obtained aerogels showed promising properties with high specific surface areas and total pore volumes.
The production of novel materials and value-added chemicals from lignin has received considerable attention in recent years. Due to its abundant occurrence in nature, there is a growing interest in utilizing lignin as a feedstock for functional materials production, for example aerogels. Much like in the synthesis of phenol-based resins, the vacant ortho positions of the aromatic rings in lignin can crosslink with formaldehyde and form polymeric gels. After drying the hydrogels with supercritical CO2, highly porous aerogels are obtained. Current study focuses on the preparation and thorough parametrization of organosolv lignins from different types of lignocellulosic biomass (aspen, pine, and barley straw) as well as their utilization for the preparation of lignin-5-methylresorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. The thorough structural characterization of the obtained aerogels was carried out by gas adsorption, IR spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The obtained lignin-based monolithic mesoporous aerogels had specific surface areas and total pore volumes in the upward ranges of 450 m(2)/g and 1.4 cm(3)/g, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据