4.6 Article

A Process Parameter Design Method for Improving the Filament Diameter Accuracy of Extrusion 3D Printing

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15072454

关键词

extrusion 3D printing; printing accuracy; filament diameter; process parameter; rheological property

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Research Foundation of HIT [IR2021227]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing [cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0803]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52105439]
  4. Leading Wild Goose Program Scientific Research Project of Harbin Institute of Technology [XNAUEA5640202220-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel method based on experiments to control filament diameter in extrusion 3D printing, investigates the influence of process parameters and rheological properties on filament diameter, and validates the reliability of the method using PLCL as a case study.
Process parameters have a significant impact on the filament diameter of extrusion 3D printing. To precisely control filament diameter, this paper proposes a novel method based on experiments to guide process parameter design. Additionally, an extrusion 3D printing device was developed, by which the influence of crucial process parameters and rheological properties on the diameter of printed filaments could be investigated experimentally and theoretically. Furthermore, poly (l-lactide-co-epsilon-caprolactone) (PLCL) was used as a case study to detail the design procedure of the proposed method. The printable range of the process parameters for PLCL was acquired, and a fitting surface for the experimental data was calculated to guide the process parameter design. According to the results of the experiment, by adjusting the process parameters, PLCL filaments with five different diameters of 120, 130, 140, 150, and 160 mu m can be fabricated with a 100 mu m nozzle. The deviations between the actual filament diameters and the desired diameter are less than 5 mu m, which validates the reliability of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据