4.6 Review

Root Causes and Mechanisms of Failure of Wind Turbine Blades: Overview

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15092959

关键词

wind energy; wind turbine blades; maintenance; structural health monitoring

资金

  1. Innovation Foundation of Denmark [8055-00012A]
  2. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark [19-M02-DTU]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a review of the root causes and mechanisms of damage and failure to wind turbine blades, including leading edge erosion, adhesive joint degradation, trailing edge failure, buckling, and blade collapse phenomena. The methods of investigating different damage mechanisms, such as full-scale testing, post-mortem analysis, computational simulations, and sub-component testing, are reviewed. The importance of manufacturing defects for the failure mechanisms of wind turbine blades is highlighted.
A review of the root causes and mechanisms of damage and failure to wind turbine blades is presented in this paper. In particular, the mechanisms of leading edge erosion, adhesive joint degradation, trailing edge failure, buckling and blade collapse phenomena are considered. Methods of investigation of different damage mechanisms are reviewed, including full scale testing, post-mortem analysis, incident reports, computational simulations and sub-component testing. The most endangered regions of blades include the protruding parts (tip, leading edges), tapered and transitional areas and bond lines/adhesives. Computational models of different blade damage mechanisms are discussed. The role of manufacturing defects (voids, debonding, waviness, other deviations) for the failure mechanisms of wind turbine blades is highlighted. It is concluded that the strength and durability of wind turbine blades is controlled to a large degree by the strength of adhesive joints, interfaces and thin layers (interlaminar layers, adhesives) in the blade. Possible solutions to mitigate various blade damage mechanisms are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据