4.6 Article

Structural and Luminescence Behavior of Nanocrystalline Orthophosphate KMeY(PO4)2: Eu3+ (Me = Ca, Sr) Synthesized by Hydrothermal Method

期刊

MATERIALS
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15051850

关键词

europium doped phosphate; nanocrystallites; hydrothermal synthesis; optical properties; IR; Raman; emission studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

KMeY(PO4)(2):5% Eu3+ phosphates were synthesized by a hydrothermal method and their spectroscopic, structural, and morphological properties were investigated. The obtained samples had an average crystal diameter of about 15 nm and showed improved crystallinity after thermal treatment. The luminescent properties of the samples were also enhanced, with the KSrY(PO4)(2):5% Eu3+ sample calcinated at 500 degrees C exhibiting the most intense emission.
KMeY(PO4)(2):5% Eu3+ phosphates have been synthesized by a novel hydrothermal method. Spectroscopic, structural, and morphological properties of the obtained samples were investigated by X-ray, TEM, Raman, infrared, absorption, and luminescence studies. The microscopic analysis of the obtained samples showed that the mean diameter of synthesized crystals was about 15 nm. The KCaY(PO4)(2) and KSrY(PO4)(2) compounds were isostructural and they crystallized in a rhabdophane-type hexagonal structure with the unit-cell parameters a = b approximate to 6.90 angstrom, c approximate to 6.34 angstrom, and a = b approximate to 7.00 angstrom, c approximate to 6.42 angstrom for the Ca and Sr compound, respectively. Spectroscopic investigations showed intense D-5(0) -> F-7(4) transitions connected with D-2 site symmetry of Eu3+ ions. Furthermore, for the sample annealed at 500 degrees C, europium ions were located in two optical sites, on the surface of grains and in the bulk. Thermal treatment of powders at high temperature provided better grain crystallinity and only one position of dopant in the crystalline structure. The most intense emission was possessed by the KSrY(PO4)(2):5% Eu3+ sample calcinated at 500 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据