4.2 Review

Warfarin dosing strategies evolution and its progress in the era of precision medicine, a narrative review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
卷 44, 期 3, 页码 599-607

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-022-01386-8

关键词

Genetic-guided warfarin dosing; Warfarin clinical dosing; Warfarin dosing algorithms; Warfarin fixed dosing

资金

  1. Qatar National Library [IRGC-06-JI-19-205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the different dosing strategies for warfarin initiation, with a focus on genotype-guided dosing and the recent evidence for and against its use. The use of genetic dosing for warfarin initiation has shown potential for better outcomes, but its clinical and economic benefits are still controversial.
Background For decades, vitamin K antagonists and specifically warfarin, have been the sole agents used orally to manage thromboembolic conditions, including stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Several factors lead to warfarin dose variability, including genetic and non-genetic factors which made warfarin management challenging especially at the initiation phase. To overcome the challenges with warfarin dosing at initiation, strategies other than conventional or fixed dosing were introduced and explored. Aim In this narrative review, we aim to discuss and critique the different dosing strategies for warfarin at initiation with more focus on genotype-guided warfarin dosing and the most recent supporting evidence for and against its use. Method Medline database was searched from 1965 to July 2021. Articles addressing different warfarin dosing methods were screened for inclusion. Results A number of methods exist for warfarin initiation. Studies comparing different dosing methods for initiation yielded conflicting outcomes due to differences in study design, population studied, comparator, and outcomes measured. Conclusions Looking at the big picture, the use of genetic dosing for warfarin initiation can lead to better outcomes. Whether these better outcomes are clinically or economically beneficial remains controversial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据