4.2 Article

Inspiratory muscle function in asthmatic and healthy subjects: Influence of age, nutrition and physical activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
卷 53, 期 9, 页码 893-899

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2016.1165698

关键词

Respiratory muscle; physical endurance; obesity; physical activity; asthma

资金

  1. FAPERGS
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare inspiratory muscle function (strength and endurance) between asthmatics and healthy controls, and the influence of age, nutritional status and physical activity on them. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Asthmatic and healthy subjects, aged 6 to 18 years old, recruited from two public schools in Southern Brazil were included in the study. Asthmatic subjects were selected using the criteria presented by the International Study on Asthma and Allergies in Children and control subjects based on the absence of respiratory symptoms. Anthropometric data was measured, body mass index calculated and subjects classified as normal weight, overweight or obese. Physical activity levels, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and inspiratory muscle endurance (IME) were also evaluated. Results: A total of 314 participants were included, separated into control group (181) and asthmatics (133), with a total mean age of 11 years. When both groups were compared, there were no significant differences in both MIP and IME. However, when groups were analyzed subdivided in children and adolescents, IME was significantly reduced (p = 0.003) in asthmatic adolescents. Indeed, when groups were also stratified considering the nutritional status, IME showed a reduction in asthmatic adolescents with overweight (p = 0.042) and obesity (p = 0.041) when compared to healthy controls. No effects of physical activity levels between groups were found. Conclusions: Results demonstrate a reduction in the IME in asthmatic adolescents with overweight and obesity, indicating an association between asthma, nutritional status and respiratory muscle function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据