4.8 Article

Selective Borohydride Oxidation Reaction on Nickel Catalyst with Anion and Cation Exchange Ionomer for High-Performance Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202103539

关键词

DBFCs; fuel utilization; ionomers; nickel; non-noble metal catalysts

资金

  1. EPFL
  2. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne
  3. Empa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates a facile direct synthesis method using a non-noble nickel catalyst for the anode of direct borohydride fuel cells (DBFCs). The effects of different ionomer types on the catalyst's active site pH and resulting catalytic reactions are evaluated in a single-cell configuration. The performance of the nickel catalyst is compared to that of a palladium catalyst, and fuel utilization and H2 evolution measurements provide further insights into the complex anode reactions in DBFCs.
Direct borohydride fuel cells (DBFCs) operate with liquid H2O2 and a high-energy-density NaBH4 solution. A facile, direct synthesis method using a non-noble nickel catalyst for the DBFC anode is shown. The complex anode reaction with an anion-exchange ionomer (AEI) and a cation-exchange ionomer (CEI) is evaluated in half-cell and single-cell configurations. The ionomer type produces high (AEI) or low local pH (CEI) at the active site of the catalyst in the single-cell configuration, generating different catalytic reactions. The performance of the nickel catalyst is compared to that of a palladium catalyst. The selective catalytic activities for the borohydride oxidation reaction and hydrogen oxidation reaction are the key parameters for achieving good performance. Furthermore, fuel utilization and H-2 evolution measurement in a single-cell configuration provide more information on the complex anode reaction in the DBFC. The nickel catalyst with CEI on nickel foam (NiF@CEI-Ni) shows the highest DBFC peak power density (0.59 W cm(-2)) with a non-noble metal anode catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据