4.8 Article

A periplasmic cinched protein is required for siderophore secretion and virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29873-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI [P30 CA013148]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI049313, R21 AI151239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The gene rv0455c is essential for the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in low-iron conditions. Its absence results in reduced secretion of siderophores and impaired replication of the pathogen in mice. The crystal structure of Rv0455c provides insight into the unique siderophore secretion system of M. tuberculosis.
Iron is essential for growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative agent of tuberculosis. To acquire iron from the host, M. tuberculosis uses the siderophores called mycobactins and carboxymycobactins. Here, we show that the rv0455c gene is essential for M. tuberculosis to grow in low-iron medium and that secretion of both mycobactins and carboxymycobactins is drastically reduced in the rv0455c deletion mutant. Both water-soluble and membrane-anchored Rv0455c are functional in siderophore secretion, supporting an intracellular role. Lack of Rv0455c results in siderophore toxicity, a phenotype observed for other siderophore secretion mutants, and severely impairs replication of M. tuberculosis in mice, demonstrating the importance of Rv0455c and siderophore secretion during disease. The crystal structure of a Rv0455c homolog reveals a novel protein fold consisting of a helical bundle with a 'cinch' formed by an essential intramolecular disulfide bond. These findings advance our understanding of the distinct M. tuberculosis siderophore secretion system. The pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis uses the siderophores called mycobactins and carboxymycobactins to acquire iron from the host. Here, Zhang et al. identify a protein that is important for siderophore secretion and for the pathogen's growth in low-iron medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据