4.8 Article

Low complexity RGG-motif sequence is required for Processing body (P-body) disassembly

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29715-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Fellowship/Grant [IA/I/12/2/500625]
  2. DBT India [BT/PR40106/BRB/10/1918/2020]
  3. IISc
  4. DBT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Processing bodies (PBs) are RNA-protein complexes that determine mRNA fate. The study shows that Sbp1 is responsible for PB disassembly and that repeats of the RGG motif in Sbp1 play a key role. Additionally, the study finds that the addition of purified Sbp1 leads to a significant decrease in Edc3 assemblies.
Processing bodies (PBs) are higher order RNA-protein complexes that determine mRNA fate. Here, the authors show Sbp1 is responsible for PB disassembly and pinpoint a repeats of arginine and glycine (RGG) motif in Sbp1 that play a key role. P-bodies are conserved mRNP complexes that are implicated in determining mRNA fate by affecting translation and mRNA decay. In this report, we identify RGG-motif containing translation repressor protein Sbp1 as a disassembly factor of P-bodies since disassembly of P-bodies is defective in Delta sbp1. RGG-motif is necessary and sufficient to rescue the PB disassembly defect in Delta sbp1. Binding studies using purified proteins revealed that Sbp1 physically interacts with Edc3 and Sbp1-Edc3 interaction competes with Edc3-Edc3 interaction. Purified Edc3 forms assemblies, promoted by the presence of RNA and NADH and the addition of purified Sbp1, but not the RGG-deletion mutant, leads to significantly decreased Edc3 assemblies. We further note that the aggregates of human EWSR1 protein, implicated in neurodegeneration, are more persistent in the absence of Sbp1 and overexpression of EWSR1 in Delta sbp1 leads to a growth defect. Taken together, our observations suggest a role of Sbp1 in disassembly, which could apply to disease-relevant heterologous protein-aggregates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据