4.8 Article

Phase transition and remodeling complex assembly are important for SS18-SSX oncogenic activity in synovial sarcomas

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30447-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171208, 31870750]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [20JCYBJC01320]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology program [JCYJ20210324122212034]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Nankai University [030/63211052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that the binding of oncoprotein SS18-SSX to chromatin remodeling complex and its phase separation are crucial for the transformation activity in synovial sarcomas.
Oncoprotein SS18-SSX is a hallmark of synovial sarcoma. Here the authors report phase separation of SS18-SSX and the binding of SS18-SSX to chromatin remodeling complex are important for the transformation activity of the oncoprotein SS18-SSX. Oncoprotein SS18-SSX is a hallmark of synovial sarcomas. However, as a part of the SS18-SSX fusion protein, SS18's function remains unclear. Here, we depict the structures of both human SS18/BRG1 and yeast SNF11/SNF2 subcomplexes. Both subcomplexes assemble into heterodimers that share a similar conformation, suggesting that SNF11 might be a homologue of SS18 in chromatin remodeling complexes. Importantly, our study shows that the self-association of the intrinsically disordered region, QPGY domain, leads to liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of SS18 or SS18-SSX and the subsequent recruitment of BRG1 into phase-separated condensates. Moreover, our results show that the tyrosine residues in the QPGY domain play a decisive role in the LLPS of SS18 or SS18-SSX. Perturbations of either SS18-SSX LLPS or SS18-SSX's binding to BRG1 impair NIH3T3 cell transformation by SS18-SSX. Our data demonstrate that both LLPS and assembling into chromatin remodelers contribute to the oncogenic activity of SS18-SSX in synovial sarcomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据