4.8 Article

Knowledge integration and decision support for accelerated discovery of antibiotic resistance genes

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29993-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. USDA-NIFA AI Institute for Next Generation Food Systems (AIFS)
  2. USDA-NIFA [2020-67021-32855]
  3. NIEHS [P42ES004699]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a machine learning framework for automating knowledge discovery through knowledge graph construction, inconsistency resolution, and iterative link prediction. Applied to antibiotic data, the framework identifies novel antibiotic resistant genes in E. coli and validates them through wet-lab experiments.
We present a machine learning framework to automate knowledge discovery through knowledge graph construction, inconsistency resolution, and iterative link prediction. By incorporating knowledge from 10 publicly available sources, we construct an Escherichia coli antibiotic resistance knowledge graph with 651,758 triples from 23 triple types after resolving 236 sets of inconsistencies. Iteratively applying link prediction to this graph and wet-lab validation of the generated hypotheses reveal 15 antibiotic resistant E. coli genes, with 6 of them never associated with antibiotic resistance for any microbe. Iterative link prediction leads to a performance improvement and more findings. The probability of positive findings highly correlates with experimentally validated findings (R-2 = 0.94). We also identify 5 homologs in Salmonella enterica that are all validated to confer resistance to antibiotics. This work demonstrates how evidence-driven decisions are a step toward automating knowledge discovery with high confidence and accelerated pace, thereby substituting traditional time-consuming and expensive methods. Here the authors present KIDS, a knowledge graph integration and phenotypic prediction framework. When applied on antibiotic data, it identifies 6 novel antibiotic resistant E. coli genes that the authors subsequently validate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据