4.8 Article

Meta-programmable analog differentiator

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29354-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  2. French region of Brittany and Rennes Metropole through the CPER Project SOPHIE/STIC Ondes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel approach in wave-based signal differentiation by perturbing overmoded random scattering systems to precisely locate the zeros of their scattering matrices at desired frequencies. The technique overcomes limitations of existing approaches and demonstrates high fidelity and adaptability in experimental demonstrations.
We present wave-based signal differentiation with unprecedented fidelity and flexibility by purposefully perturbing overmoded random scattering systems such that zeros of their scattering matrices lie exactly at the desired locations on the real frequency axis. Our technique overcomes limitations of hitherto existing approaches based on few-mode systems, both regarding their extreme vulnerability to fabrication inaccuracies or environmental perturbations and their inability to maintain high fidelity under in-situ adaptability. We demonstrate our technique experimentally by placing a programmable metasurface with hundreds of degrees of freedom inside a 3D disordered metallic box. Regarding the integrability of wave processors, such repurposing of existing enclosures is an enticing alternative to fabricating miniaturized devices. Our over-the-air differentiator can process in parallel multiple signals on distinct carriers and maintains high fidelity when reprogrammed to different carriers. We also perform programmable higher-order differentiation. Conceivable applications include segmentation or compression of communication or radar signals and machine vision. Here, the authors report purposefully perturbed wave chaos that enables analog signal processing with unprecedented fidelity and flexibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据