4.8 Article

Cooperative catalysis by a single-atom enzyme-metal complex

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29900-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2021YFC2102800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878174, 22168024]
  3. Tsinghua-Foshan Innovation Special Fund (TFISF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a photochemical method to anchor single metal atoms on enzymes, forming stable single-atom enzyme-metal complexes. The cooperative catalysis between the lipase-active site and the single Pd atom accelerates alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reactions with high efficiency. This approach combines the advantages of single-atom catalysts and enzymes, potentially leading to hybrid catalysts with high activity and selectivity.
Anchoring single metal atoms on enzymes has great potential to generate hybrid catalysts with high activity and selectivity for reactions that cannot be driven by traditional metal catalysts. Herein, we develop a photochemical method to construct a stable single-atom enzyme-metal complex by binding single metal atoms to the carbon radicals generated on an enzyme-polymer conjugate. The metal mass loading of Pd-anchored enzyme is up to 4.0% while maintaining the atomic dispersion of Pd. The cooperative catalysis between lipase-active site and single Pd atom accelerates alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reaction between 1-bromohexane and B-n-hexyl-9-BBN with high efficiency (TOF is 540 h(-1)), exceeding that of the traditional catalyst Pd(OAc)(2) by a factor of 300 under ambient conditions. Single atom catalysts have been described for efficient and selective metal catalysis, while enzymes have been known for their recognition and binding. In this manuscript, the authors develop a photochemical method to combine the two platforms in one, and demonstrate it by anchoring Pd atoms on Candida Antarctic lipase B, for highly efficient alkyl-alkyl cross-coupling reactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据