4.8 Article

Donut-like organization of inhibition underlies categorical neural responses in the midbrain

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29318-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 EY027718]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Categorical neural responses are important for decision making, and researchers have discovered that a donut-like inhibition motif can effectively generate these responses. They found that this mechanism operates in the midbrain spatial selection network in barn owls and is necessary for categorical signaling. They also revealed a generalizable neural implementation of the donut-like motif for categorical selection.
Decision making is facilitated by categorical neuronal responses, which robustly signal a winner despite input noise. In this study, the authors demonstrate that a donut-like inhibition motif effectively generates such categorical responses. Categorical neural responses underlie various forms of selection and decision-making. Such binary-like responses promote robust signaling of the winner in the presence of input ambiguity and neural noise. Here, we show that a 'donut-like' inhibitory mechanism in which each competing option suppresses all options except itself, is highly effective at generating categorical neural responses. It surpasses motifs of feedback inhibition, recurrent excitation, and divisive normalization invoked frequently in decision-making models. We demonstrate experimentally not only that this mechanism operates in the midbrain spatial selection network in barn owls, but also that it is necessary for categorical signaling by it. The functional pattern of neural inhibition in the midbrain forms an exquisitely structured 'multi-holed' donut consistent with this network's combinatorial inhibitory function for stimulus selection. Additionally, modeling reveals a generalizable neural implementation of the donut-like motif for categorical selection. Self-sparing inhibition may, therefore, be a powerful circuit module central to categorization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据