4.3 Article

Phenolic characterization of olive genotypes potentially resistant to Xylella

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT INTERACTIONS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 462-474

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17429145.2022.2049381

关键词

Resistance to Xylella; metabolome; HPLC DAD ESI; MS-TOF; PCA; susceptible plants

资金

  1. Apulian Regional Government [DGR2191-29/11/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outbreak of olive quick decline syndrome caused by Xylella fastidiosa poses a significant threat to agriculture in Italy. A study found that certain genotypes of olive trees, genetically related to specific cultivars, have different metabolic profiles compared to susceptible ones. Additionally, a genotype related to Tunisian cultivars displayed high bacterial concentration but no symptoms, suggesting a potential link between tolerance and specific phenolic profiles.
The outbreak of the olive quick decline syndrome caused by Xylella fastidiosa represents one of the main agricultural threats in Italy. Recently, thirty asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic genotypes found in olive groves heavily compromised by the bacterium were identified. HPLC ESI/MS-TOF analyses on leaf petiole extract were carried out to characterize the metabolic profile of selected genotypes. Besides uni- and multi-variate statistical methods differentiated the metabolic profiles of olive genotypes genetically related to the cultivars 'Leccino' and 'Ciciulara', no common metabolic pattern was found among the selected genotypes with respect to susceptible one. In-depth evaluation of seven selected phenolic compounds highlighted quantitative differences between genotypes and the susceptible control cultivar but a resistance-related pattern cannot be yet defind. Nevertheless, an unusually high concentration of quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside characterized a genotype genetically related to Tunisian cultivars which displayed no symptoms besides high bacterial concentration, suggesting how tolerance may be related to peculiar phenolic profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据