4.7 Article

Global characterization of extrachromosomal circular DNAs in advanced high grade serous ovarian cancer

期刊

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-04807-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2021FZZX001-43]
  2. Beijing Kanghua Foundation for the Development of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine [KH-2021-LLZX-016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the characteristics of extrachromosomal circular DNAs (eccDNAs) in high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) and identified DNMT1(circle10302690-10302961) as the most significantly down-regulated eccDNA in metastatic tumors of HGSOC. The lower expression of DNMT1(circle10302690-10302961) was associated with worse prognosis of HGSOC.
High grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most aggressive subtype of ovarian cancer and HGSOC patients often appear with metastasis, leading to the poor prognosis. Up to date, the extrachromosomal circular DNAs (eccDNAs) have been shown to be involved in cancer genome remodeling but the roles of eccDNAs in metastatic HGSOC are still not clear. Here we explored eccDNA profiles in HGSOC by Circle-Sequencing analysis using four pairs of primary and metastatic tissues of HGSOC patients. Within the differentially expressed eccDNAs screened out by our analysis, eight candidates were validated by outward PCR and qRT-PCR analysis. Among them, DNMT1(circle10302690-10302961) was further confirmed by FISH assay and BaseScope assay, as the most significantly down-regulated eccDNA in metastatic tumors of HGSOC. Lower expression of DNMT1(circle10302690-10302961) in both primary and metastatic tumors was associated with worse prognosis of HGSOC. Taken together, our finding firstly demonstrated the eccDNAs landscape of primary and metastatic tissues of HGSOC. The eccDNA DNMT1(circle10302690-10302961) can be considered as a potential biomarker or a therapeutically clinical target of HGSOC metastasis and prognosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据