4.2 Review

Robotic-assisted right colectomy. Official expert recommendations delivered under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC)

期刊

JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY
卷 159, 期 3, 页码 212-221

出版社

ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.04.001

关键词

Surgery by robotic approach; Minimally invasive surgery; Right colectomy; Oncological colonic resection; Recommendations

类别

资金

  1. Intuitive Surgical
  2. 3M
  3. Integra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robotic-assisted right colectomy (RRC) does not provide significant benefits compared to laparoscopy for patients undergoing right colectomy for a benign pathology or cancer, but it offers a benefit in terms of post-operative morbidity compared to laparotomy. RRC has longer operating times and higher costs.
Twenty-seven experts under the aegis of the French Association of Surgery (AFC) offer this reference system with formalized recommendations concerning the performance of right colectomy by robotic approach (RRC). For RRC, experts suggest patient installation in the so-called classic or suprapubic setup. For patients undergoing right colectomy for a benign pathology or cancer, RRC provides no significant benefit in terms of intra-operative blood loss, intra-operative complications or conversion rate to laparotomy compared to laparoscopy. At the same time, RRC is associated with significantly longer operating times. Data from the literature are insufficient to define whether the robot facilitates the performance of an intra-abdominal anastomosis, but the robotic approach is more frequently associated with an intra-abdominal anastomosis than the laparoscopic approach. Experts also suggest that RRC offers a benefit in terms of post-operative morbidity compared to right colectomy by laparotomy. No benefit is retained in terms of mortality, duration of hospital stay, histological results, overall survival or disease-free survival in RRC performed for cancer. In addition, RRC should not be performed based on the cost/benefit ratio, since RRC is associated with significantly higher costs than laparoscopy and laparotomy. Future research in the field of RRC should consider the evaluation of patient-targeted parameters such as pain or quality of life and the technical advantages of the robot for complex procedural steps, as well as surgical and oncological results. (C) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据