4.6 Article

Holocene intracontinental deformation of the northern North China Plain: Evidence of tectonic ground fissures

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 49-64

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.01.003

关键词

Tectonic ground fissures; Hebei Plain; Trench; Holocene intracontinental deformation

资金

  1. NSFC project [41325009, 41190072, 41502185, 41502321]
  2. Geological Investigation Project of China Geological Survey [1212011120099, 1212011220259]
  3. National Programme on Global Change and Air-Sea Interaction, SOA [GASI-GEOGE-01]
  4. Taishan Scholar Program
  5. Aoshan Elite Scientist Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following the collecting and analyzing of field data on the geometry and kinematics characteristics of ground fissures in the northern North China Plain (NNCP), this paper shows that en echelon ground fissures or tectonic ground fissures with a length of several meters to tens of kilometers extending along active faults are possibly controlled by underlying active faults. There are two groups of tectonic ground fissures developed in the NNCP. One group consists of ENE-trending right-stepping ground fissures, some of which have a component of sinistral motion. The other group is NNE-trending left-stepping ground fissures with dextral motion. A large amount of data from trenches, boreholes and seismic exploration reflect that they are active-faulting-related. The NNW-trending regional extensional stress field and the reactivation of pre-existing faults are the major factors controlling ground fissures. Data from the Quaternary sedimentary records, deep incised valleys, the distribution of earthquakes and ground fissures, and our field work show that the Holocene intracontinental deformation of the NNCP is characterized by intense faulting and northwestward tilting, which may be related to a NNW-SSE-oriented tensional stress field in the shallow crust and asthenospheric upwelling in the mantle. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据